[comic] The Planning Fallacy: Why We're Terrible at Setting Realistic Deadlines

Articleblog.doist.comJanuary 20, 2022

AI Summary

Setting realistic deadlines proves challenging due to our consistent underestimation of task completion times, despite past experiences. Unrealistic deadlines generate unnecessary stress and harm trust with peers. To mitigate these risks, five strategies enhance our ability to estimate project timelines effectively. - Break down tasks into smaller parts and estimate each individually. - Add buffer time to schedules, expecting to use only a fraction of the available time. - Use historical data from similar tasks to inform current estimations. - Reduce the scope of projects, prioritizing quality over quantity. - Communicate obstacles early and often if challenges arise.

Why It Matters for Leaders

This article highlights the planning fallacy, a common issue for Engineering Leaders when setting unrealistic deadlines that lead to stress and diminished trust among team members and stakeholders. A key takeaway is to break down tasks into smaller parts and add buffers to schedules, allowing for more accurate estimations and improved project management.

Category

Delivery and Execution

Target Audience

Engineering Manager

Tags

PrioritizationPlanningCommunicationExecution
Share: