[comic] The Planning Fallacy: Why We're Terrible at Setting Realistic Deadlines
AI Summary
Setting realistic deadlines proves challenging due to our consistent underestimation of task completion times, despite past experiences. Unrealistic deadlines generate unnecessary stress and harm trust with peers. To mitigate these risks, five strategies enhance our ability to estimate project timelines effectively. - Break down tasks into smaller parts and estimate each individually. - Add buffer time to schedules, expecting to use only a fraction of the available time. - Use historical data from similar tasks to inform current estimations. - Reduce the scope of projects, prioritizing quality over quantity. - Communicate obstacles early and often if challenges arise.
Why It Matters for Leaders
This article highlights the planning fallacy, a common issue for Engineering Leaders when setting unrealistic deadlines that lead to stress and diminished trust among team members and stakeholders. A key takeaway is to break down tasks into smaller parts and add buffers to schedules, allowing for more accurate estimations and improved project management.
Category
Delivery and ExecutionTarget Audience
Tags
Related Content
How to estimate as as an engineering leader | LeadDev
The Art of ETA. How to give precise development time⦠| by Dana Yudelevich | Level Up Coding
Agile Estimation: Why The Fibonacci Sequence Works
Principles behind the Agile Manifesto
How deadline-driven behavior sends your Scrum Teams spinning out of control | by Todd Lankford
Making the case to decision makers: the presentation format to follow
The Blue Tape List β Rands in Repose
This 90-Day Plan Turns Engineers into Remarkable Managers | First Round Review