📄

The Future of Performance Reviews

Target Audience
Engineering ManagerDirector of EngineeringCTO / VP Engineering
Type
Article
Link
https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-performance-management-revolution?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=hbr&utm_source=twitter&tpcc=orgsocial_edit
Date Added
Feb 14, 2022 9:51 PM
Language
English
AI summary

Performance reviews are evolving to address the shortcomings of traditional methods, emphasizing continuous feedback over annual evaluations. Companies increasingly recognize that ongoing dialogue between employees and managers fosters growth, engagement, and accountability. For instance, organizations that implement regular check-ins report higher employee satisfaction and improved performance metrics. Key points: - Transition from annual reviews to continuous feedback systems. - Enhanced employee-manager communication leads to better engagement and accountability. - Regular check-ins replace the need for traditional performance ratings. - Organizations see improved performance and satisfaction levels with ongoing feedback. - Emphasizing developmental conversations rather than evaluative ones.

Why it matters for leaders?

This article matters for Engineering Leaders as it addresses the shortcomings of traditional performance reviews, which can hinder team motivation and development. An actionable takeaway is to adopt a more continuous feedback approach that fosters open communication and aligns individual contributions with team goals.

image